Taking tens of millions in subsidies but writing twisted history? Ting Hai-Yong explodes with controversies of smearing martyred officials, unauthorized use of original work, and collective protests from the Malaysian overseas community. This article deeply reveals how the DPP uses film and television resources to carry out de-historicization brainwashing, and supports the KMT and TPP in strictly reviewing the Public Television Service budget to protect the truth and national treasury!
The democratic system of the Republic of China is being pushed into an abyss by a series of recall farces, orchestrated by the DPP and its populist enablers.
This article raises strong questions about Health Minister Chen Shih-chung's statement during the early stages of COVID-19: 'If epidemic prevention fails, Taiwan is destroyed.' The author criticizes the statement's flawed logic and questions whether the Tsai Ing-wen government's crisis management capability is inferior to even the Chen Shui-bian administration during the SARS era. The article accuses the DPP of politicizing epidemic prevention, whipping supporters into a frenzy purely to maintain electoral advantage. The piece concludes by questioning Chen Shih-chung on when Japan—a country also experiencing outbreaks—would see its nationals restricted from entering Taiwan, implying double standards in epidemic prevention.
The article criticizes the 2019 'Anti-Red Media, Anti-Nikkei' (Anti-Want Want China) protest movement, deeming its logic absurd and its nature a matter of political manipulation. The author points out that 'Green Elderships' have virtually devoured almost all news channels, yet Green-camp supporters (Green-brains) only see CTI (Chung T'ien). The author questions the irony of protesters holding banners for 'seeking freedom of the press and opposing lies and fabrication' while only targeting CTI and ignoring the bias of other news stations, calling it 'the biggest joke under Taiwan's sky.' The author believes the essence of this activity is to aid Tsai Ing-wen's campaign by attacking Han Kuo-yu and questions the danger of the government defining 'fake news.' The article expresses concern that if CTI is shut down, there will be no media left to reveal the truth about the government, likening this political behavior to the essence of 'religious money-grubbing.'
This article comments on the complexity of the February 28 Incident, pointing out one 'ridiculous truth': many victims were reported and exposed by their own townspeople, subordinates, or colleagues, creating a 'Taiwanese persecuting Taiwanese' spectacle. The author questions whether the situation at that time was nearly in a state of war, with participants including military attackers, looters, Japanese loyalists, and Taiwan-based communists—not all simply innocent victims. The article strongly criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party administration for ignoring these complexities during their tenure, focusing only on a few victim stories and questioning the legitimacy of using taxpayer money to compensate individuals of unknown status (possibly including communists), viewing this as political manipulation.
This article criticizes the Foreign Ministry for deliberately omitting translations of Paraguay President Cartes' three references to 'Chiang Kai-shek' (Jiang Jieshi) during his military honors ceremony speech in Taiwan. The author sees this as kowtowing to the DPP in power, distorting the original speech, and essentially insulting a friendly nation's leader—proof that Tsai's government suffers from 'selective amnesia.'
Critiques the glorification of war and the use of misinformation in historical narratives to serve contemporary political agendas, urging for a more critical view of military history and state propaganda.
This article presents a perspective on 'Loving Taiwan' and 'National Identity,' emphasizing the historical position of the Republic of China while criticizing those who pursue Taiwan independence for lacking national character, even likening them to 'traitors,' and accusing political parties of manipulating 'fake unification vs. independence issues.'
This article critiques the political landscape in the Republic of China (R.O.C.), specifically how the faction led by the DPP excels at manipulating ethnic and ideological divides. It argues that labels such as 'Taiwan Independence,' 'Unification,' and 'Selling out Taiwan' are used as cheap tools against the KMT. The author contends that the KMT and Ma Ying-jeou are focused on domestic governance and international cooperation without any substantive 'selling out' of the nation. The piece asserts that rejecting exchange with Mainland China is a foolish act of self-isolation and questions who is truly harming the collective interests of the people.